PA11 (Polyamide 11)
polymersemi-crystalline thermoplastic polyamide (bio-based)
Nylon 11Rilsan PA11 (Arkema)EOS PA 1101Bio-based PA11Polyamide-11
Mechanical & thermal properties — 1 condition
| Property | SLS as-built (isotropic) |
|---|---|
| Elastic modulus | 1–2 GPa |
| Yield strength (0.2%) | 37–48 MPa |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 40–50 MPa |
| Elongation at break | 25.0–55.0 % |
| Density | 0.93–1.00 g/cm³ |
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2 W/m·K |
| Glass transition (Tg) | 42–50 °C |
| As-built surface Ra | 10.0–20.0 µm |
Values shown as min–max where a spread is reported, otherwise as typical ± unit. Ranges reflect inter-source variation, not single-sample scatter. All values are for AM-processed specimens unless noted.
Engineering considerations
- Ductility advantage: if the application undergoes dynamic loading, repeated assembly/disassembly, or impact, PA11 is preferred over PA12. For static structural loading, PA12 is usually sufficient and cheaper.
- Living hinge design: minimum hinge thickness 0.4 mm, minimum bend radius 0.8 mm for ≥10,000 flex cycles. Test at -20°C if cold-temperature flex is required — PA11 remains ductile at low temperature.
- Powder parameters: PA11 requires sintering temperature ~2–3°C lower than PA12 on the same system. Build chamber temperature ~165–168°C vs PA12 ~170°C. Calibrate before running production PA11 builds.
- Bio-claim: PA11 uses >80% bio-based carbon content (renewable castor oil feedstock). Suitable for companies under bio-preferred purchasing programmes (USDA BioPreferred etc.).
- Inter-batch variability: stichel-2017-pa11 round-robin study showed 15–30% coefficient of variation (CV) for elongation across laboratories using nominally identical SLS processes. Test each production batch.
- Post-processing: vapour smoothing works well for PA11. Dyeing achieves deeper colour penetration than PA12 in some formulations.
- Thermal performance: PA11 HDT is similar to PA12 — both limited to ~60–80°C continuous service with load. For higher temperatures, switch to PEEK or high-performance PA (PA46, PPA).
Advantages
- 2–3× higher elongation at break vs PA12 — key for applications requiring ductility or energy absorption
- Bio-based monomer (castor oil feedstock) — lower lifecycle carbon footprint, supports bio-preferred procurement
- Similar machine compatibility to PA12 — usable on most PA12-capable SLS systems after parameter adjustment
- Excellent impact resistance and notch toughness — remains tough down to -40°C
- Lower moisture absorption than PA6/PA66 — more dimensionally stable in varying humidity
- Good chemical resistance (oils, greases, fuels, weak acids) — comparable to PA12
- Good UV and ozone resistance for outdoor flexible components
- Regulatory-compliant grades for food contact and medical applications
Limitations
- Lower stiffness than PA12 — not suitable where high rigidity is needed
- Higher sintering temperature window requires careful thermal calibration — not all PA12 SLS systems have qualified PA11 parameters
- More limited availability of SLS machine parameters from OEMs vs PA12 — narrower ecosystem
- Powder aging degradation similar to PA12 — rigorous refresh-ratio control required
- Limited machine compatibility vs PA12 — verify with machine OEM before specifying
- Higher raw material cost than PA12 (~20–40% premium) due to bio-based process
- Less published AM data than PA12 — design allowables require more in-house testing
Typical applications
Flexible air ducts and tubing with high flex-cycle requirementsSports equipment: football boots, cycling shoes, customised orthotic insolesLiving hinges and snap-fit assemblies requiring multiple opening cyclesImpact-resistant enclosures and housingsOil & gas flexible pipe liners and sealing componentsAutomotive interior flexible clips and grommetsMedical consumables (non-implantable): catheter components, sampling devicesBio-preferred procurement: sustainability-mandated industrial partsRobotics flexible actuator components
Industries
automotiveindustrialconsumer
Standards & certifications
Compatible AM processes (1)
Other polymer materials
Related calculators
PackingBuild-chamber utilisation, virgin powder consumption, refresh cost, and cost/part for SLS and MJF. EOS P396, HP MJF 5200/4200, Farsoon 403P presets.RoughnessTheoretical Ra and Rz from layer thickness and surface angle (staircase effect). Upward, downward, and vertical faces. LPBF, SLS, FDM, SLA, DED. Per Grimm et al.Build Time EstimatorPer-process build time from part volume, layer count, and machine throughput. LPBF, SLS, FDM, SLA, DED, binder presets included.Shrinkage CompensationPer-axis scale factors for sintering (binder jet, MIM-AM) and resin cure (SLA/DLP) shrinkage. Inputs: green density, target density, material class.
Last reviewed: 2026-05-04 · v1 · Sources: eos-pa1101-2023, arkema-pa11-2023, stichel-2017-pa11, zarringhalam-2006-pa12, debroy-2018-review