Electropolishing Time-to-Ra Estimator
UniversalEstimate wet-electropolishing time, material removal depth, and achievable Ra on LPBF and DED metal parts. Covers stainless steel, titanium, cobalt-chrome, nickel superalloys, and aluminium. Ra decay modelled as an exponential approach to a material-specific floor roughness.
Sign up to use this calculator
additive.tools is a membership platform for AM engineers. Sign up free to unlock 11 calculators plus the full materials & process knowledge base. Pro tier unlocks all 44 tools.
- 11 free calculators (44 total on Pro)
- 46-material property knowledge base
- Save your calculations to your profile
- No credit card · no marketing emails
Ra decay model
Ra(d) = Ra_f + (Ra₀ − Ra_f) · e^(−d / λ)- Ra(d)
- Surface roughness after removal depth d[µm]
- Ra₀
- Initial as-built roughness[µm]
- Ra_f
- Electro-finishing floor roughness[µm]
- d
- Cumulative material removal depth[µm]
- λ
- Characteristic decay length (material-dependent)[µm]
Exponential decay model consistent with published EP data for LPBF stainless (Ra₀ ≈ 6–12 µm → Ra_f ≈ 0.2–0.6 µm). Current density shifts the effective λ.
Process notes
Electropolishing is the preferred final step for 316L and CoCrMo implants — removes the recast layer, improves corrosion resistance, and achieves Ra < 0.8 µm typically required by ISO 13485 quality systems.
Ti-6Al-4V requires a specialist electrolyte (perchloric/acetic or fluoride-based). Standard stainless EP baths do not work. Consult the electrolyte supplier for current-density limits and bath life.
Sources
- [1]Han, W. & Fang, F. (2019) — Fundamental aspects and recent developments in electropolishing — Int. J. Machine Tools & Manufacture 139:1-23
- [2]ASTM B912-02 — Standard Specification for Passivation of Stainless Steels Using Electropolishing
- [3]Urlea, A.S. & Brailovski, V. (2017) — Electropolishing allowances for powder-bed laser-melted Ti-6Al-4V — J. Mater. Process. Technol. 242:1-11