additive.tools
Post-Processing/Dimensional Inspection (CMM & 3D Scanning)
inspectioninspection metrology

Dimensional Inspection (CMM & 3D Scanning)

Also known as: CMM, Coordinate Measuring Machine, Structured-Light Scanning, Laser Scanning, GD&T Verification, First Article Inspection

Dimensional inspection verifies that an AM part's external geometry meets its drawing tolerances. Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM) use a touch probe to measure discrete features (bores, datums, GD&T callouts) to micrometre accuracy. Structured-light and laser 3D scanners capture millions of surface points to build a dense mesh that is compared against nominal CAD (colour-map deviation) — ideal for the freeform surfaces AM produces. The two are complementary: CMM for tight-tolerance functional features, scanning for whole-surface form and first-article CAD comparison.

Why AM parts need this

AM parts must be dimensionally qualified before use — and AM's freeform, organic geometry (topology-optimised brackets, conformal-cooled inserts) is exactly where traditional CMM-only inspection struggles and 3D scanning excels. First Article Inspection (FAI) for aerospace and medical AM requires documented dimensional verification mapped to the drawing. Scanning a whole AM part against nominal CAD also quantifies build distortion and shrinkage — feeding back into shrinkage-compensation and orientation decisions for the next build. CMM verifies the machined critical features to PPAP/FAI tolerance after post-machining.

Key parameters

CMM accuracy0.5–3 µm

Tactile CMM measurement uncertainty (E0 per ISO 10360). For tight GD&T on machined AM features.

3D scan accuracy10–50 µm

Structured-light / laser. Lower accuracy than CMM but captures full surface — ideal for freeform AM geometry and CAD comparison.

Scan point densitymillions of points

Dense mesh enables colour-map deviation against nominal CAD — visualises distortion and form error across the whole part.

OutputFAI / PPAP report

Documented dimensional report mapped to drawing GD&T — required for aerospace (AS9102) and automotive (PPAP) AM qualification.

Compatible materials

titanium alloysnickel alloysstainless steelaluminium alloyscobalt chrometool steelsPA12PA11TPU

Limitations

  • Surface/external geometry only — internal porosity and internal channels require CT scanning instead
  • CMM is slow and measures discrete points — not ideal for whole-surface freeform AM geometry (use scanning)
  • 3D scanning accuracy (10–50 µm) is coarser than CMM (sub-3 µm) — not sufficient alone for the tightest functional tolerances
  • Shiny/reflective AM metal surfaces may need matting spray before optical scanning — adds a step and slight thickness
  • Detects out-of-tolerance but does not correct it — feeds accept/reject and process-feedback decisions

Providers

View all post-processing vendors →

Relevant standards

ISO 10360AS9102ISO 1101VDI VDE 2634

CMM and 3D-scan accuracy figures from Hexagon, ZEISS, Creaform, and GOM published specifications (manufacturer tier). Standards per ISO 10360 (CMM), VDI-VDE 2634 (optical 3D), AS9102 (FAI).

All post-processing