additivetools

Maraging Steel MS1 (18Ni-300)

metal

maraging steel (ultra-high-strength, precipitation-hardened)

18Ni-300DIN 1.2709UNS K93120EOS MS1Vascomax 300AMS 6514 (wrought ref.)
Density
8.05 g/cm³
YS (LPBF as-built (XY) — soft martensite)
940–1150 MPa
UTS (LPBF as-built (XY) — soft martensite)
1030–1270 MPa
Elongation (LPBF as-built (XY) — soft martensite)
7.0–15.0 %
Elastic modulus
170–190 GPa
Thermal conductivity
16.0–18.5 W/m·K

Composition — DIN 1.2709 / UNS K93120 / AMS 6514

ElementMin %Max %Notes
Ni17.0019.000High Ni for martensite transformation without carbon; key for intermetallic precipitation
Co8.509.500Lowers martensite finish temperature; promotes Mo precipitation on ageing
Mo4.505.200Primary age-hardening precipitate Ni₃Mo; solid solution strengthener
Ti0.500.800Forms Ni₃Ti precipitates; critical for achieving peak hardness on ageing
Al0.050.150Deoxidiser; promotes ordered Ni₃(Al,Ti) phase
Febal.balance
C0.030Low carbon is essential — carbon in martensite causes brittleness. 'Maraging' = martensite + ageing (no carbon hardening)
Mn0.100
Si0.100
P0.010
S0.010
Zr0.010
B0.003Grain boundary strengthener; suppresses grain boundary failure during ageing

Mechanical & thermal properties — 3 conditions

PropertyLPBF as-built (XY) — soft martensiteLPBF aged 480°C/6h (XY) — peak hardnessLPBF aged 480°C/6h (Z)
Elastic modulus170–190 GPa
Yield strength (0.2%)940–1150 MPa1760–1970 MPa1640–1860 MPa
Ultimate tensile strength1030–1270 MPa1870–2100 MPa1750–1980 MPa
Elongation at break7.0–15.0 %2.0–7.0 %1.5–5.0 %
Hardness (HV)340–410 HV10530–610 HV10520–600 HV10
Fatigue strength650–850 MPa
Density8.05 g/cm³
Thermal conductivity16.0–18.5 W/m·K
CTE10.2–11.2 µm/m·K

Values shown as min–max where a spread is reported, otherwise as typical ± unit. Ranges reflect inter-source variation, not single-sample scatter. All values are for AM-processed specimens unless noted.

Engineering considerations

  • Ageing protocol: 480–490°C for 4–8h (vacuum preferred, inert atmosphere acceptable). Peak hardness at ~5–6h at 480°C. Over-ageing at 500°C+ causes precipitate coarsening and hardness loss. Measure hardness after each ageing batch.
  • Tooling design for conformal cooling: minimum channel diameter 1.5 mm (printable), typical 3–5 mm for cooling channels. Channel wall thickness minimum 1.5 mm to handle injection pressure (up to 200 MPa). Use computational mould flow analysis to optimise channel layout.
  • Dimensional change on ageing: linear shrinkage 0.05–0.08% — account for this in pre-age dimensions when tolerances are tight (±0.01 mm).
  • Surface finish for mould inserts: as-built Ra 10–15 µm. Post-machining to Ra <0.4 µm (polished), then EDM or hand polishing to Ra <0.1 µm (mirror) for Class A cosmetic surfaces.
  • Fatigue in tooling: typical injection mould tool sees 10–50 million cycles over lifetime. Design for 10⁷ cycle endurance at nominal stress — use FEA to verify gate and runner areas where stress concentrations occur.
  • Heat treatment sequence for tooling inserts: LPBF → stress-relieve (300°C/1h, reduces distortion risk) → machine cavity to near-final size → age (480°C/5h) → finish grind/EDM/polish.
  • Welding/repair: maraging steel responds well to laser micro-welding using matching 18Ni filler wire. Post-weld local ageing (480°C/3h at weld zone) restores hardness without full re-ageing the tool.
  • Print orientation for tooling: print the mould cavity face in XY (highest mechanical properties at the contact surface). Gate areas should be in XY if possible — highest cyclic stress location.

Advantages

  • Highest strength of any standard LPBF metal — YS 1870 MPa, UTS 1990 MPa (aged) surpasses all other AM metals
  • Near-zero dimensional change on ageing (<0.1% linear) — machine in soft state, age to final hardness
  • Achieves injection mould tool hardness (52–54 HRC) without quench-and-temper distortion risk
  • Conformal cooling channels: LPBF enables complex internal channels impossible in machined H13/P20 tooling — 20–40% cycle time reduction in injection moulding
  • Good machinability in as-built state (37–40 HRC) — conventional machining with carbide tooling
  • Good EDM machinability — electrode wear is low; important for mould cavity finishing
  • Isotropic ageing response — hardness is uniform regardless of build orientation
  • Weldable (laser and TIG) with maraging 18Ni filler — mould repair without re-aging in some cases

Limitations

  • Very low ductility after ageing (2–7%) — not suitable for impact loading or crash-absorbing structures
  • Mandatory ageing required for structural use — as-built properties (37 HRC) are insufficient for tooling
  • High cost: raw powder 4–6× more expensive than tool steel P20 per kg. Cost-justified primarily for complex conformal cooling tooling
  • Co content raises bio-release concerns for implantable devices — not used for medical implants
  • Over-ageing above 510°C causes Ni₃Mo dissolution and hardness reduction — temperature control within ±5°C is critical
  • Susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement in certain plating processes — avoid acid pickling without pre-bake
  • Limited corrosion resistance compared to stainless — may require surface coating (TiN, CrN PVD) for corrosive media exposure
  • Print parameter sensitivity: maraging steel has narrow VED window for optimal density; deviations cause LOF porosity that reduces fatigue life

Typical applications

Injection mould inserts with conformal cooling channelsDie-casting inserts and die-casting toolingHigh-pressure forming tools and press hardening diesAerospace structural brackets and fasteners (ultra-high-strength)Motorsport suspension components and uprightsRocket engine thrust chambers and nozzle hardwareHigh-performance cutting tool bodies and insertsPrecision jigs and fixtures requiring high dimensional stabilityUnderwater and ballistic components requiring extreme strength

Industries

toolingaerospacemotorsportdefence

Standards & certifications

ASTM-E8established

Tensile test method for acceptance testing of AM maraging steel

aerospacetoolingindustrial
ASTM-E466established

Force-controlled fatigue testing — critical for tooling fatigue qualification

aerospacetooling
ISO-52904established

Process quality assurance for safety-critical PBF parts

aerospacedefence

Compatible AM processes (1)

Other metal materials

Related calculators

Last reviewed: 2026-05-04 · v1 · Sources: eos-ms1-2023, kempen-2011-ms1, bai-2017-ms1, debroy-2018-review, yadollahi-2017-fatigue, ASTM-E8, ASTM-E466