Inconel 718
metalnickel superalloy — precipitation-hardened
Composition — UNS N07718 / ASTM F3055-14
| Element | Min % | Max % | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ni | 50.00 | 55.000 | Base element. High Ni content drives creep resistance and oxidation protection |
| Cr | 17.00 | 21.000 | Oxidation resistance via Cr₂O₃ scale; pitting and SCC resistance |
| Nb | 4.75 | 5.500 | Primary strengthener via γ'' (Ni₃Nb) precipitation; must stay in solution after anneal |
| Mo | 2.80 | 3.300 | Solid solution strengthening; creep resistance |
| Ti | 0.65 | 1.150 | Forms γ' (Ni₃Ti,Al) precipitates; controls γ'/γ'' ratio |
| Al | 0.20 | 0.800 | γ' former; oxidation resistance |
| Fe | 17.00 | 19.000 | |
| Co | — | 1.000 | |
| C | — | 0.080 | |
| Mn | — | 0.350 | |
| Si | — | 0.350 | |
| P | — | 0.015 | |
| S | — | 0.015 | |
| B | — | 0.006 | Grain boundary strengthening — low B is critical to prevent hot cracking in LPBF |
| Cu | — | 0.300 |
Mechanical & thermal properties — 5 conditions
| Property | LPBF as-built (XY) | LPBF as-built (Z) | LPBF SA+DA (XY) — primary service condition | LPBF SA+DA (Z) | LPBF + HIP + SA+DA (isotropic) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic modulus | 185–210 GPa | — | 195–215 GPa | — | — |
| Yield strength (0.2%) | 650–920 MPa | 520–780 MPa | 1070–1180 MPa | 990–1110 MPa | 1050–1150 MPa |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 880–1120 MPa | 750–1000 MPa | 1310–1400 MPa | 1240–1360 MPa | 1270–1380 MPa |
| Elongation at break | 10.0–30.0 % | 8.0–28.0 % | 12.0–22.0 % | 10.0–19.0 % | 14.0–24.0 % |
| Hardness (HV) | 260–360 HV10 | — | 400–460 HV10 | — | — |
| Fatigue strength | — | — | 480–620 MPa | — | 580–720 MPa |
| Density | 8.19 g/cm³ | — | — | — | — |
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4 W/m·K | — | 11.4 W/m·K | — | — |
| CTE | 12.5–13.5 µm/m·K | — | — | — | — |
Values shown as min–max where a spread is reported, otherwise as typical ± unit. Ranges reflect inter-source variation, not single-sample scatter. All values are for AM-processed specimens unless noted.
Engineering considerations
- Always specify SA+DA post-processing: solution anneal at 980°C (not 1065°C — avoids δ-phase dissolution zone) + 720°C/8h FC to 620°C/8h. The exact temperature and time must be controlled to ±10°C.
- Laves phase verification: before shipping structural parts, verify Laves dissolution via SEM-EDS or hardness mapping. Residual Laves will appear as Nb/Mo-rich particles and corresponds to hardness excursions.
- Stress relief is mandatory before part removal: minimum 1000°C/1–2h in vacuum or argon. Removal without stress-relief will cause significant distortion in large or complex parts.
- Build orientation: for fatigue-critical applications, ensure primary load axis is in the XY plane in as-built condition. After SA+DA, anisotropy reduces but does not disappear — document orientation on traveller.
- HIP requirement: for NADCAP-controlled flight-critical parts, HIP (1163°C/100 MPa/4h) before SA+DA is standard practice at most Tier 1 aerospace AM suppliers. Budget 40–60% cost premium over SA+DA alone.
- Cracking risk: IN718 has lower hot-cracking susceptibility than many other Ni superalloys (no high Al+Ti) but liquation cracking at grain boundaries can occur with improper preheating or excessive energy density.
- Surface finish: as-built Ra 10–20 µm is too rough for many hot-section applications. Electrochemical machining (ECM) or abrasive flow machining (AFM) used for internal channel smoothing — specify finish method in design.
- Creep design: use the 100,000h larson-miller parameter data for wrought IN718 as a conservative baseline. LPBF SA+DA creep data is still sparse — avoid creep-critical applications without specific test data.
- Repair: LPBF IN718 can be laser-cladded or TIG-welded with IN625 or IN718 filler — widely used for cast/forged IN718 engine part repair. Process qualification required per OEM specifications.
Advantages
- Highest retained strength of common AM metals at elevated temperature — YS remains >700 MPa at 650°C
- Outstanding oxidation and hot corrosion resistance to 980°C
- Well-characterised post-processing route (SA+DA) produces wrought-equivalent or better properties
- LPBF enables complex internal cooling channels impossible in forging — critical for turbine thermal management
- Wide LPBF process window — relatively low crack susceptibility vs IN625, IN939, or CM247LC
- Comprehensive standards ecosystem: ASTM F3055, AMS 7009, NADCAP — clear qualification path
- Good weldability (low B, controlled S) — allows hybrid LPBF + TIG repair strategies
- Magnetic permeability of ~1.01 — effectively non-magnetic for sensor-critical applications
Limitations
- SA+DA heat treatment is mandatory for structural use — as-built properties are unacceptable for high-temperature service
- Laves phase formation during LPBF is intrinsic — Nb segregation cannot be fully prevented; only dissolved in post-processing
- Residual stress is extremely high in as-built LPBF IN718 — stress-relieve before removal from build plate or part will distort
- Very low thermal conductivity (11 W/m·K) — highest residual stress and cracking risk of the common LPBF metals
- Powder cost is 3–5× that of 316L stainless — cost-justify with functional requirement, not just temperature tolerance
- LPBF IN718 has lower oxidation resistance above 980°C than cast/wrought — chromia scale is not stable at higher temperatures
- High γ'' precipitation kinetics during LPBF cooling may lead to over-aging in slow-cooling regions — parameter uniformity critical
- Powder reactivity with moisture and oxygen — strict storage protocol; atmospheric control during process and powder handling mandatory
Typical applications
Industries
Standards & certifications
IN718 (UNS N07718) parts produced by powder bed fusion — composition, powder, and minimum mechanical property requirements
IN718 LPBF for aerospace structural applications — solution-annealed + double-aged (SA+DA) condition requirements
Required by most Tier 1 aerospace OEMs for structural and engine-adjacent IN718 LPBF parts. Sets UTS ≥1310 MPa, YS ≥1070 MPa, El ≥12%.
LPBF process requirements — machine qualification, atmosphere, process controls for aerospace production
Force-controlled fatigue testing — critical for engine and rotating applications
Third-party accreditation for AM metallic parts — required by most prime aerospace contractors
NADCAP accreditation required before supplying flight-critical IN718 AM parts to Airbus, Boeing, GE Aviation, Pratt & Whitney, Rolls-Royce, and Safran.