Inconel 939
metalnickel superalloy — γ'-precipitation-hardened (high Al+Ti)
IN939UNS N13009AMS 5872 (wrought/cast ref.)Alloy 939
Composition — UNS N13009 / AMS 5872
| Element | Min % | Max % | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ni | bal. | balance | |
| Cr | 21.00 | 23.000 | Oxidation and hot corrosion resistance (Cr₂O₃ scale); higher than IN718 |
| Co | 18.00 | 20.000 | Raises the γ solidus; reduces stacking fault energy to impede dislocation climb — critical for creep resistance |
| Al | 3.40 | 4.000 | Primary γ' former (Ni₃Al); with Ti creates high γ' volume fraction ~55%. High Al is the main driver of strain-age cracking risk in AM |
| Ti | 3.40 | 4.000 | γ' former (Ni₃Ti); Ti/Al ratio ~1:1 gives γ' (Ni₃(Al,Ti)) the optimal composition for high-temperature stability |
| W | 1.80 | 2.200 | Solid solution strengthener in γ matrix; also stabilises γ' precipitates at high temperature |
| Ta | 1.00 | 1.600 | Solid solution strengthener; reduces coarsening rate of γ' during service |
| Nb | 0.90 | 1.300 | Minor γ'' former; also forms carbides for grain boundary strengthening |
| C | 0.13 | 0.200 | Higher C than IN718 — carbides (M₂₃C₆, MC) are intentional grain boundary strengtheners for creep resistance. Must be controlled: too high → grain boundary embrittlement |
| Zr | 0.04 | 0.100 | Grain boundary strengthener; reduces grain boundary oxidation at high temperature |
| B | 0.01 | 0.013 | Grain boundary strengthener and diffusion retarder. Range must be controlled — excessive B causes liquation cracking in LPBF |
| Fe | — | 1.000 | |
| Mn | — | 0.200 | |
| Si | — | 0.200 | |
| P | — | 0.015 | |
| S | — | 0.015 | |
| Cu | — | 0.100 |
Mechanical & thermal properties — 4 conditions
| Property | LPBF as-built (XY) | LPBF as-built (Z) | LPBF SA+FA (XY) — primary service condition | LPBF SA+FA (Z) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elastic modulus | — | — | 200–220 GPa | — |
| Yield strength (0.2%) | 680–920 MPa | 550–780 MPa | 800–940 MPa | 720–860 MPa |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 850–1100 MPa | 720–980 MPa | 940–1080 MPa | 860–1020 MPa |
| Elongation at break | — | 2.0–9.0 % | 5.0–12.0 % | 2.5–8.0 % |
| Hardness (HV) | 340–430 HV10 | — | 355–410 HV10 | — |
| Fatigue strength | — | — | 420–580 MPa | — |
| Density | 8.23 g/cm³ | — | — | — |
| Thermal conductivity | 11.0 W/m·K | — | — | — |
| CTE | 12.2–13.4 µm/m·K | — | — | — |
Values shown as min–max where a spread is reported, otherwise as typical ± unit. Ranges reflect inter-source variation, not single-sample scatter. All values are for AM-processed specimens unless noted.
Engineering considerations
- Heat treatment sequence is critical: solution anneal at 1160°C (not lower — incomplete γ' dissolution leads to coarse γ' after ageing). The full three-stage cycle (1160°C/4h + 1000°C/6h + 850°C/24h) is required; shortcutting the 850°C/24h stage reduces γ' uniformity.
- Strain-age cracking prevention: stress-relieve in vacuum at 900°C/2h before removing from build plate, then solution anneal before final ageing. Direct ageing of as-built IN939 without solution anneal will cause part cracking due to constrained γ' precipitation on grain boundaries.
- Build orientation: for turbine airfoil LPBF, orient blade chord (principal tensile stress direction) in the XY plane. Z-direction properties are substantially weaker — document orientation on material traceability certificate.
- HIP recommendation: for rotating or fracture-critical parts, HIP at 1160°C/100 MPa/4h prior to SA+FA is strongly recommended. Closes solidification microcracks and sub-surface porosity. HIP temperature must match solution anneal temperature to avoid double-annealing grain growth.
- Cracking inspection: 100% fluorescent penetrant inspection (FPI) after build and after stress-relief is required before heat treatment. Any surface-connected cracks are an immediate rejection; sub-surface cracks require HIP evaluation. X-ray CT recommended for complex internal geometries.
- DED repair protocol: for cast IN939 blade tip or LE repair, pre-heat the substrate to ~200–300°C before deposition to reduce thermal shock. Post-deposit local solution anneal and re-age to restore γ' structure in the repair zone. Verify hardness match between deposit and parent metal.
- Powder control: IN939 powder must be stored in sealed containers with desiccant and nitrogen backfill. Oxygen content of recycled powder must be verified (max 50 ppm increase per cycle). Al and Ti oxidation in powder degrades γ' precipitation response.
- Competition with IN718: for applications below 700°C, IN718 LPBF is preferred — better characterised AM database, superior ductility, easier processing, lower cost. Specify IN939 only when creep resistance or hot corrosion resistance above 700°C is genuinely required.
Advantages
- Superior elevated-temperature strength vs IN718 above 700°C — γ' volume fraction ~55% vs ~45% in IN718; remains load-bearing to ~900°C
- Outstanding hot corrosion resistance — high Cr (22 wt%) provides superior type I hot corrosion resistance compared to IN718 (17–21 wt% Cr)
- LPBF enables complex internal cooling channels in turbine airfoils that are impossible in cast IN939 (directionally solidified or equiaxed)
- DED-Laser repair of worn cast IN939 turbine components is established practice — extends service life of expensive turbine hardware
- Near-zero γ'' content (unlike IN718) — properties are thermally stable above 650°C; no δ-phase formation concerns
- Good oxidation resistance to ~980°C due to protective Cr₂O₃+Al₂O₃ scale
Limitations
- High strain-age cracking susceptibility — high Al+Ti content causes rapid γ' precipitation on reheating. Stress-relieving before solution anneal is critical; incorrect heat treatment sequence will crack the part
- More difficult LPBF processability than IN718 — narrower process window; requires precise parameter control to avoid solidification cracking
- Limited AM-specific data — LPBF IN939 published literature is sparse compared to IN718/IN625. Use caution when extrapolating data to design
- Mandatory three-step heat treatment (SA + two-stage age) adds cost and time vs. IN718 two-step SA+DA
- High raw powder cost — Co, Nb, Ta additions make IN939 powder ~40% more expensive than IN718 per kg
- Welding/repair is more difficult than IN718 — higher cracking susceptibility; requires controlled preheat and inter-pass temperature management
- NADCAP qualification path for LPBF IN939 is less mature than IN718 — no dedicated AMS standard exists yet (unlike AMS 7009 for IN718 LPBF)
Typical applications
Industrial gas turbine (IGT) first and second stage blades and vanesAero-engine hot-section airfoils (nozzle guide vanes, turbine blades)DED repair of cast/wrought IN939 turbine blade leading edges and tipsCombustion liner components requiring high oxidation resistance (>900°C)Power generation turbine ring segments and shroudsRocket combustion chamber hardware in high-temperature zones
Industries
aerospaceenergydefence
Standards & certifications
ASTM-E466established
Force-controlled fatigue testing — for turbine blade fatigue qualification
aerospaceenergy
NADCAP-AC7110-14established
Third-party accreditation required for flight-critical IN939 AM parts
aerospace
IN939 is used in hot-section turbine parts where NADCAP accreditation is typically mandatory for supply to aero-engine OEMs.
Compatible AM processes (2)
Other metal materials
Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5titanium alloy — alpha-betaTi-6Al-4V ELI (Grade 23)titanium alloy — alpha-beta (extra low interstitial)CP-Titanium Grade 2commercially pure titanium — alphaCP-Ti Grade 4titanium — commercially pure alphaTi-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Motitanium alloy — near-alpha316L Stainless Steelaustenitic stainless steel304L Stainless Steelaustenitic stainless steel17-4PH Stainless Steelmartensitic precipitation-hardening stainless steel15-5 PH Stainless Steelmartensitic precipitation-hardened stainless steel420 Stainless Steelmartensitic stainless steelAlSi10Mgaluminium-silicon alloy (cast grade adapted for AM)AlSi7Mg Aluminium Alloyhypoeutectic Al-Si-Mg precipitation-hardenable aluminium alloyScalmalloy®aluminium alloy — Al-Mg-Sc-ZrAlSi12aluminium — hypoeutectic/eutectic Al-SiInconel 718nickel superalloy — precipitation-hardenedInconel 625nickel superalloy — solid-solution-strengthenedHastelloy® Xnickel superalloy — solid-solution strengthenedWaspaloy®nickel superalloy — γ'-precipitation-hardenedHaynes 282nickel superalloy — γ' precipitation-hardenedCoCrMocobalt-chromium alloy (biomedical and aerospace grade)Maraging Steel MS1 (18Ni-300)maraging steel (ultra-high-strength, precipitation-hardened)M300 Tool Steel (18Ni-300 Maraging Steel)maraging steel — tooling grade (ultra-high-strength, precipitation-hardened)H13 Tool Steelchromium-molybdenum hot-work tool steelCuCrZrcopper alloy — precipitation-hardenedCu-CP (Commercially Pure Copper)copper alloy — commercially pureCuSn10 (Bronze)copper alloy — tin bronzeGRCop-84copper alloy — dispersion/precipitation strengthenedInvar 36iron-nickel low-expansion alloyNiTi / Nitinolnickel-titanium shape-memory alloy
Related calculators
NDT SelectorSelect the right non-destructive testing method for your AM part. Inputs: material class, defect focus, geometry, production volume, and criticality. Ranked scorecard across CT, X-ray, UT, FPI, MPI, eddy current, and visual inspection with detection limits and standard references.LPBF Porosity PredictorPredict lack-of-fusion and keyhole porosity from laser parameters. Maps VED and normalised enthalpy to relative density and flags dangerous regimes.Surface Treatment SelectorRank post-print surface treatments (shot peening, electropolishing, tumbling, PVD, and more) against Ra target, material, fatigue criticality, and corrosion requirements.Powder Characterisation TrackerScore a powder batch against key qualification metrics — particle size distribution, flowability, apparent/tap density, moisture, and oxygen content.HT AdvisorStandard stress-relief, solution, and aging cycles for AM metals (Ti-6Al-4V, IN718, 17-4PH, AlSi10Mg, 316L, CuCrZr) per AMS, ASTM F3301, and AMS 5664.FatigueS-N curve estimation for AM metals using the Basquin law. Accounts for surface roughness stress concentration (Kt from Ra), build direction anisotropy, and porosity factor.
Last reviewed: 2026-05-13 · v1 · Sources: special-metals-in939-2023, reed-superalloys-2006, mostafaei-2021-in939-lpbf, debroy-2018-review, ASTM-E8, ASTM-E466, NADCAP-AC7110-14
Unlock the full property data — sign up free
Free account · no credit card · no marketing. Sign up to unlock the full library: 26 articles, 45 materials, 10 processes, 43 papers and more.